Saturday, 13 September 2014

The Proactionary Imperative with Steve Fuller and Veronika Lipinska

Today I went to see a presentation hosted by the London Futurists at Birbeck regarding a new book about transhumanism.


The book is written by Steve and Veronika, two academics, one on science and philosophy, the other in law.


Their idea is that there is a trend in society of being over precautionary (the example was given of the Bush government's restrictions on stem cell development, severely inhibiting biotechnology in the 'States). Their counter to this is to examine the current state of transhumanism and to make some recommendations based on an idea proposed by Max More called the Proactionary Principal. This is to say that instead of trying to avoid the consequences of change by not changing, the risks should be managed on a national or even global scale, underwritten by governments and the benefits distributed by the same to all. They also propose an idea of "hegenetics", which is a portmanteau of genetics and hedge-fund, that when a person, or group, have their DNA exploited they can benefit from it. It's a bit like you or I copyrighting our own DNA.

The presentation was very engaging and the discussion afterwards lively, Steve noting that the Futurists aught to be more politically engaged than currently, and that it seemed to be more of a hobby than a movement.

Saturday, 6 September 2014

Brighton Mini-Maker Faire 2014

Today I went for a day out to Brighton to the Mini-Maker Faire. There was the usual collection of stands there, with rather a lot of 3D printers in evidence. There's a move to put 3D printers in every school!


There was also robots and sculpture and sculpture of robots:


There were also some very stange tricks with LED's. This is a set of spinning LEDs making a globe:


I went for a walk on the seafront afterwards and saw some rather good grafitti:


Monday, 25 August 2014

Using PowerMock to Test Singletons

Back to the Job again.

I've been trying to test a small suite of classes based around exception handling. One of the classes is a class factory implemented as a singleton, which has proved impossible to test with the usual techniques, i.e. sub-class and override and Mockito.

A class factory is a class used to create and initialise other classes. A singleton class is designed only to be instantiated once and then every use afterwards uses the same instance over and over again, rather than creating multiple copies of the same class.

Sub-class and override is a technique used to isolate various methods of a class during testing. Take a simple class like this:

public class DemoSuperClass {

    protected List createNameList() {
        List returnList = new ArrayList();

        returnList.add("Steve Stranger");
        returnList.add("James Jones");
        returnList.add("Harry Harnot");
        returnList.add("Bill Blogger");

        return returnList;
    } 

    public void printNameList() {
        List nameList = createNameList();
        for(String name: nameList)
            System.out.printLn(name.split(" ")[0]); //prints the first name
    }

}

Say you want to test printNameList but with an empty list of names, or different names. The best way to do this is in the test harness declare a sub-class of DemoSuperClass and override createNameList:

private class DemoSubClass { //class in the test harness

    @Override
    protected List createNameList() {
        List returnList = new ArrayList();
        return returnList;
    } 
}

Now the sub-class can be tested.

Even if the method being overridden is called by the constructor, it will still work:

public class DemoConstructorClass {

    protected DemoConstructorClass() {
        procedure1();
    }

    protected void procedure1() {
        System.out.println("procedure1");
    }
}

    //in the test harness
    private class TestDemoConstructor extends DemoConstructorClass {

        @Override
        protected void procedure1() {
            System.out.println("Overriden procedure1");
        }
        
    }


Where this won't work is in testing singletons. The singleton I'm trying to test looks something like this:

public class SingletonClass {
    private static SingletonClass instance = new SingletonClass();

    public static SingletonClass getInstance() {
        return instance;
    }
    
    protected SingletonClass() {
        procedure1();
    }

    protected void procedure1() {
        System.out.println("procedure1 called");
    }
}

    //in use, say, in the test harness
    SingletonClass instance = SingletonClass.getInstance();

Notice that the constructor is protected and cannot be accessed from outside the class. The only way to create the class is through getInstance and that returns the private static instance field created when the class is first referenced. Sub-classing and overriding has no effect, because the call to constructor happens as soon as the class gets referenced and the private static instance gets created. Mockito spies don't work either for the same reason. Enter PowerMock.

PowerMock is a set of libraries used to extend existing mock libraries, such as EasyMock and Mockito to cover situations where it's difficult to use them, such as static or final methods and constructors. In particular, the MemberModifier.replace method allows us to override methods (but only static ones) without instantiating the class.

    public static void replacement() {
        System.out.println("replacement");
    }
    
    public void testGetInstance() {
        //procedure1 has to be static to be replaced
        MemberModifier.replace(MemberModifier.method(SingletonClass.class,
                                                     "procedure1"))
                .with(MemberModifier.method(this.getClass(),
                                            "replacement"));
        SingletonClass result = SingletonClass.getInstance();
    }

It's a bit brute-force, and with better design of the singleton class maybe unnecessary, but at least it can now be tested.

Saturday, 16 August 2014

The Future of Futurism with Amy Zalman

Today I went to see a speech, hosted by the London Futurists, by Amy Zalman, who is CEO of the World Future Society.


Amy introduced herself. She's worked in various strategy think tanks and the like, including the U.S. War College. She wants to promote futurism and the futurist profession, intoducing the idea of the "Now" futurist.

There was a lively Q&A afterwards, which was, to some extent, more interesting that the main speech.

Monday, 4 August 2014

Rhythms of the World 2014

This Saturday I went to the Rhythms of the World festival in Hitchin with my mate John:


He and his wife, Alison, are moving to France shortly, so this may be the last time we do the gig together. Jill, the organiser, was somewhat disappointed to hear that he wouldn't be able to do it in future, misguidedly attempting to dissuade him by pointing out that France was full of French people.

We did our usual four hour shift and caught an excellent sitar player, Mehboob Nadeem, half way through his set:


Truly excellent!

I also spotted the mural, done every year:


Exhausted, we had our free lunch and retired gracefully. I tell you now, if you had to pick up dog ends for four hours, you wouldn't smoke!

Thursday, 31 July 2014

Half a Century

To celebrate having reached the half-way point (hopefully), I went into town last week for my annual trip to the Design Museum, accompanied by some of my relatives.

It was a nice, bright shiny day in Old London Town:


The Design of the Year exhibition was on and there was a mix of the practical and strange:


On the left is a wall calendar made of Lego and, on the right, a giant-sized Twitter feed printer. There were cars and smartphone apps and chairs and dresses. There was also a rather nice, if expensive, folding bike:

and a new type of aircraft, similar to the Westland Pterodactyls of the 1930's:


More mundane, but perhaps just as significant, is Fairphone, from Holland. As the name implies, it's an ethically sourced smartphone.

Saturday, 19 July 2014

True Detective

True Detective is now out on DVD in the U.K. Louisiana State Detectives Rust Cohle (Matthew McConaughey) and Marty Hart (Woody Harrelson) are called to the scene of what looks like a ritual murder:


The series follows the case in flashback as the two detectives are interviewed many years after by their counterparts working a similar murder. A lot of fuss has been made of the series, preempting a cult following, but it is justified. McConaughey is hot property at the moment, after Mud and more recent films, and Cohle is a very suitable vehicle. Some of the weirder ideas that Cohle has (or purports to have: you're never quite sure if he's just playing games) would sound rubbish from a lesser actor, but he holds the attention perfectly. Harrelson's role is more solid and conventional, but it contrasts well with Cohle and is no less compelling. I honestly believe that you could just show the interviews without the flashback and it would still be good watching.

The direction and script are equally good and a third component, even a third actor really, is the atmospheric Louisiana countryside, part industrial (a strong feature being the refineries and chemical works supporting oil industry along the Gulf coast) and still very rural and religious.

Very, very recommended.

Tuesday, 15 July 2014

Jack the Giant Slayer

A retelling of the old fairy tale, Jack (Nicholas Hoult) takes his horse to the City market to sell, exchanging it for some mysterious beans and embroiling himself with the Princess (Eleanor Tomlinson) and the King's scheming advisor (Stanley Tucci).


An amiable story, well told, with a good supporting cast including Ewen Bremner, Eddie Marsan, Ian McShane and Ewan McGregor. More fun than you would think and very recommended.

Sunday, 29 June 2014

BDD and JBehave

I've been in my new job for a few weeks now and encountered Behavior Driven Development in the code I'm looking at, using JBehave.

BDD is a way of structuring unit tests in such a way as to make them more human-readable. Typically, a conventional unit test looks something like this (this is for a small builder class I’ve created):

@Test
public void testOneWhere() {
    //select with one criteria
    SQLBuilder instance = new SQLBuilder();
    instance.select().table("A_TABLE");
    String result = instance.where("A_COLUMN", "A_VALUE").build();
    assertTrue("result is not proper SQL: " + result,
            result.equals("SELECT * FROM A_TABLE 
                           WHERE A_COLUMN = \"A_VALUE\""));
}

This is quite a small test, but it’s easy to see that someone non-technical would have difficulty following what was going on here. Plus it’s not very flexible: if you want to test boundary conditions, for example, you either have to do a lot of cut-and-pasting or some fancy footwork with the test libraries.

Compare this to the equivalent BDD statement (called stories):

Scenario: with a where clause

Given a new SQLBuilder object
When select is called
And table is set to A_TABLE
And where is set to A_COLUMN equals A_VALUE
And build is called
Then the result is SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE A_COLUMN = "A_VALUE"

This is supported in the test harness by methods bound to the statements in the story:

@When("select is called")
public void selectIsCalled() {
    sqlBuilder.select();
}

@When("table is set to $table")
public void tableSetToTable(String table){
    sqlBuilder.table(table);
} //etc.

Not only is the story more readable, but you can parameterise the calls, setting up tables of inputs and expected outputs. Nice.

Tuesday, 27 May 2014

Penny Dreadful

Imagine all the Gothic horror stories of the 19th Century, real and fictional. Throw them all together in Victorian London and you'd end up with something like this:


Seems a bit over the top for me, but the acting seems up to scratch.

Monday, 19 May 2014

Goodbye to All That

Today was my last exam at Bromley for the Foundation Degree Course. It was Computer Systems, i.e. assembler and digital circuits using something called VHDL. My least favourite subjects on the course.


I've done very well at the development side of the course, pulling out all the stops and getting 91% in the object-oriented software development assignment, for which I won (jointly) first prize:


Rather expensive, too.

It's been an adventurous two years, something I never thought I'd be able to do, but I did it and that's something.

Wednesday, 14 May 2014

Introduction to Neo4j

Neo Technologies run little evening seminars to introduce their graph database technology and I took the liberty of attending one yesterday evening. You get a free book!


They're based around the back of the Tate Modern, in an area which seems like an extension of Shoreditch with loads of start-ups and overpriced coffee.

It was a very interesting presentation, given by Rik Van Bruggen (Belgian), giving the background to the database and a really good demo using belgian beers as a dataset. Neo4j also has a community version that you can download as well as a free on-line course (with registration).

Rick also demonstrated a web site that visualises recommendations in Amazon.com, which is quite groovy.

Sunday, 11 May 2014

Premiership Blues

Y'know a while ago, I mentioned that it looked like Chelsea had the Premiership sewn up. Then Liverpool came into the running and it looked like they were going to win. Funny how things turn out...


Inch-by-inch, City took over the top slot, first from Arsenal, and then from Liverpool (Blue beating Red twice).

Even better is that not only have the people across town won nothing, they're not even in Europe, having been pipped by Tottenham. Sad, really. And funny. They'll be back, though. They're annoying like that.

It does feel weird, City winning things. Nice to have to get used to it, though.

Wednesday, 7 May 2014

UXB on the Wild Shore

Before I start my exams on Friday, in a kind of pilgrimage of sorts, I went for a walk on Shoeburyness sea front only to be faced by a long fence:


(Taken using the steam-driven mobile and thus the poor quality). There were signs on the fence explaining it's purpose:


Locals know that Shoeburyness was the army ordnance testing range for some years and still has a military/M.o.D. presence. Then again, the Luftwaffe used the river to guide them into London and could have dropped something on the way back; or it could be something related to the ammunition ship, the Richard Montgomery, sunk off the Isle of Sheppey, although that's mostly opposite Thorpe Bay, so that's alright, then.

Saturday, 3 May 2014

Sid Meier's Ace Patrol

I'm always on the lookout for cheap games and I thought I'd check this one out.


I've managed to survive the missions so far:



It's £4.99 on Steam and, like all Sid Meier games, it has a certain charm and certainly fun. The game plays a little like Wings of Glory (what used to be Wings of War), a card-based miniatures game:

Friday, 2 May 2014

Lego Simpsons

Now I like Lego and I like the Simpsons: yes, it's lost it's edge over the years, and I got into (and out of) Family Guy, but it's still pretty good. However, I'm not so sure about the latest Lego minifig series:


Apparently it's to go with one of the latest episodes:


I must not complain about the new Lego minifigs. I must not complain about the new Lego minifigs.
I must not complain about the new Lego minifigs. I must not complain about the new Lego minifigs.
I must not complain about the new Lego minifigs. I must not complain about the new Lego minifigs.
I must not complain about the new Lego minifigs. I must not complain about the new Lego minifigs.
I must not complain about the new

Thursday, 1 May 2014

Wednesday - The Graphs of Gaming and Recruitment

Yesterday evening, I went to a presentation on Graph Databases (specifically Neo4j, who were the organisers), hosted by Skills Matter.

First up was Nigel Small who talked about Zerograph, a new container/server for Neo4j.


Nigel gave a quick overview of Zerograph, highlighting it's ability to host more than one database and the use of ZeroMQ (thus the name) to increase reliability and robustness. ZeroMQ is a message queue, which is a piece of software designed to buffer and schedule messages between two systems in a more controlled way than a direct connection. It also, in ZeroMQ's case, allows for temporary disconnections, saving the messages to be processed when the connection is resumed. How this works in practise is another matter.

One of things emphasised throughout the talks was the speed with which Neo4j processes queries and returns results. Graph databases are designed to cope with information which is highly relational in nature, so something that in standard SQL would take seconds or even minutes with multiple joins, takes a fraction of that in a graph database.

Next up was Matt Wright to talk about the work at his company Stitched regarding the use of Neo4j in social networks for recruiting.


A quite amusing presentation, Matt illustrated the problems with existing social networks, such as Facebook and LinkedIn, and how "private" networks could be used to give more authentic results.

The last speaker was Yan Cui, from GamesSys, to talk about his experiences using Neo4j to model his company's Freemium online game "Here Be Monsters".


The game is resource based and can be incredibly complex and interrelated, so any small change in the underlying data can have considerable consequences. They've tried to make changes by rule-of-thumb, but this proved too unwieldy, slow and error-prone, so they've been modelling it with Neo4j and had much better results.

One of the things mentioned during the presentations was Cypher. Being interested in cryptography, I was a little baffled, but this turns out to be the Neo4j equivalent of SQL:

MATCH (n:Person)-[:KNOWS]->(m:Person) WHERE n.name="Alice"

Looks similar enough, although I can't see why they didn't call it Graph Query Language (GQL), which would be much more obvious.

Saturday, 26 April 2014

Saturday - The Future of Healthy Longevity

Today, I went to a presentation on longevity, quite a popular subject amongst the London Futurists, second only to the Singularity. It was done in three parts, the first by Phil Micans:


Phil discussed the issue that ran through all the presentations: that absolute longevity (how long you live) is only as important as how healthy you are, otherwise the suffering, and it's associated cost to society, make the extra years pointless. He mentioned various new technologies, especially peptides, which have produced amazing results, including growing back one chap's finger tip:


Next on was Avi Roy, who discussed the possible areas of research and narrowed it down to nine different areas, each area affecting different diseases to a greater or lesser extent:


The effect being that if you address one factor, affecting one type of illness, another illness replaces it. All the nine factors have to be tackled together.

The third speaker was Tuvi Orbach, who discussed the effect of lifestyle on longevity.


He's a bit of an advert for his subject, being 65. Healthy living!

Wednesday, 16 April 2014

Dependency Injection with Google Guice

One of the problems that we get in software development, specifically in the design of software classes, is that of the connection between classes. If one class uses another directly, even though it works, this can cause problems later on and is known as "close coupling". Here is a mundane example:

//a really dumb message sending class
public class MessageSender {
    public void sendMessage(String message) {
        System.out.println(message);
    }
}

//another dumb class that uses the message sender
public class MessageUser {
    //a reference to the sender object
    private MessageSender messageSender;
    //the message sender object is created in the constructor
    public MessageUser() {
        this.messageSender = new MessageSender();
    }
    //send the message via the sender
    public void sendMessage(String message) {
        messageSender.sendMessage(message);
    }
}

//the main class that uses the message classes
public class MessageMain {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MessageUser messageUser = new MessageUser();
        messageUser.sendMessage("This is a test");
    }
}

OK, this is really mundane, but can see that MessageUser cannot use any other way of sending messages. If you want to use another means, say email, you'd have to either change what MessageSender does or change MessageUser to use a different class, call it EMailSender. However, we can now use an interface instead of a class:

public interface MessageSender {
    public void sendMessage(String message);
}

//an implementation of the interface
public class SystemMessageSender implements MessageSender {
    public void sendMessage(String message) {
        System.out.println(message);
    }
}

You still have to change MessageUser, but to use an interface given to, or "injected" into, the MessageUser object via the constructor:

public class MessageUser {
    //a reference to the interface
    private MessageSender messageSender;
    //the interface is sent to the object using the constructor
    public MessageUser(MessageSender messageSender) {
        this.messageSender = messageSender;
    }
    
    public void sendMessage(String message) {
        messageSender.sendMessage(message);
    }
}

This works if we then, in the main class, create the object that implements the MessageSender and pass it to, or inject it into, the MessageUser object:

public class MessageMain {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SystemMessageSender messageSender = new SystemMessageSender();
        MessageUser messageUser = new MessageUser(messageSender);
        messageUser.sendMessage("This is a test");
    }
}

Now if we want to have MessageUser send emails we create a class which also implements the MessageSend interface:

//an implementation of the interface
public class EMailMessageSender implements MessageSender {
    public void sendMessage(String message) {
        EMail.textMessage(message);
    }
}

All that then has to be done is create an object of this class in the main class and then pass it to MessageUser, as before:

        EMailMessageSender messageSender = new EMailMessageSender();
        MessageUser messageUser = new MessageUser(messageSender);
        messageUser.sendMessage("This is a test");

This technique, known as Dependency Injection, is quite an important design pattern and is mandatory in certain frameworks, such as Spring.

Introducing Google Guice


So far, so good, and it's difficult to see how this can be really improved upon. However, Guice (pronounced with a J rather than a G) does for dependency injection what Mockito does for unit testing. To introduce Guice into the above example, we have to create another class, an extension of Guice's AbstractModule class:

public class MessageModule extends AbstractModule {
    protected void configure() {
        bind(MessageSender.class).to(SystemMessageSender.class);
    }
}

You can sort-of see what's going on. The module is responsible for creating the class that implements the interface, so whenever the interface is used, the object is bound to it. The magic happens in the Injector, used in the main class:

        Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new MessageModule());
        MessageUser messageUser = injector.getInstance(MessageUser.class);
        messageUser.sendMessage("This is a test");

Notice that the module hasn't been told about MessageUser, so the Injector is figuring out it's dependencies from the constructor of the class, and this also has to change using the @Inject annotation:

    @Inject
    public MessageUser(MessageSender messageSender) {
        this.messageSender = messageSender;
    }

Now all this doesn't seem like a big deal, if anything we've added lines and classes, but if you've got a lot of classes with umpteen dependencies, Guice can save you a lot of work.

Tuesday, 15 April 2014

Captain America: The Winter Soldier

Being (relatively) cheap Tuesday at Empire Cinemas on th' BasVegas Strip, I took advantage and went to see the latest in the Marvel Avengers franchise. Now an agent of S.H.I.E.L.D., Steve Rogers, a.k.a. Captain America, is confronted with a conspiracy when Nick Fury is attacked.


There's lots of bangs and crashes and a reasonably decent plot, but is a Superhero movie at heart despite higher ambitions. All the team turn up, so it ends up being an Avengers movie without the Avengers, but the acting is ok, if a little pedestrian (it seems a long time ago since Robert Redford was in All The President's Men) and there's a fair number of cameo's, but it's Samuel Jackson, as Nick Fury, and Chris Evans, as th' Cap', that drive the movie.